<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amtrak, a new feature, and comment pork products</title>
	<link>http://blog.joelkeller.com/2008/01/05/amtrak-a-new-feature-and-comment-pork-products/</link>
	<description>Where a writer decides to write for his own damn self for a few minutes</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: TD</title>
		<link>http://blog.joelkeller.com/2008/01/05/amtrak-a-new-feature-and-comment-pork-products/#comment-347</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.joelkeller.com/2008/01/05/amtrak-a-new-feature-and-comment-pork-products/#comment-347</guid>
					<description>yeah, that's so restrictive.  the same with having the user key in a few random letters/numbers for verification.  you wouldn't want to impose such a restriction on all of your commenters.

maybe you can ask the spambots nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, that&#8217;s so restrictive.  the same with having the user key in a few random letters/numbers for verification.  you wouldn&#8217;t want to impose such a restriction on all of your commenters.</p>
<p>maybe you can ask the spambots nicely.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joel Keller</title>
		<link>http://blog.joelkeller.com/2008/01/05/amtrak-a-new-feature-and-comment-pork-products/#comment-342</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.joelkeller.com/2008/01/05/amtrak-a-new-feature-and-comment-pork-products/#comment-342</guid>
					<description>Your comment went through, TD, because I've already approved you as a commenter. I've investigated other methods, and none of them are foolproof. I could have users log in to comment, but that seems too restrictive to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment went through, TD, because I&#8217;ve already approved you as a commenter. I&#8217;ve investigated other methods, and none of them are foolproof. I could have users log in to comment, but that seems too restrictive to me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TD</title>
		<link>http://blog.joelkeller.com/2008/01/05/amtrak-a-new-feature-and-comment-pork-products/#comment-335</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.joelkeller.com/2008/01/05/amtrak-a-new-feature-and-comment-pork-products/#comment-335</guid>
					<description>use better blogging software that has at least some level of authentication.  not sure if this one does, but i'm about to find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>use better blogging software that has at least some level of authentication.  not sure if this one does, but i&#8217;m about to find out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
